U.S. Immigration Policy Essay

U.S. Immigration Policy Essay-56
After Arizona, in which direction should they expect reform to go, and in which direction should they push those policies?As with other crucial questions about our immigration policy, the answers may well lie in a careful examination of American history.

Tags: Scarlet Letter Research Paper ThesisPid Controller Phd ThesisAp English Language And Composition Rhetorical EssayThesis In EssayResearch Proposal Format ExampleMarking Scheme For English Media CourseworkEssay For My Favourite BookEssay About My Professional GoalsBook Report Elementary SchoolDissertation Contents

As Scalia noted, "In light of the predominance of federal immigration restrictions in modern times, it is easy to lose sight of the States' traditional role in regulating immigration — and to overlook their sovereign prerogative to do so." He is correct: Federalism and immigration have interacted in complicated ways since our republic was created.

In fact, until the late 19 century, immigration was an issue largely left up to individual states to regulate.

A look at the history of our immigration system can therefore offer some important clarification of the dispute at the heart of Arizona v. But that history also has a great deal to say about our approach to immigration policy more broadly.

After all, Arizona did not resolve the much bigger dilemma facing the nation: how, exactly, we should repair a national immigration system that is quite clearly broken.

Arguing that the federal government had proved incapable of stopping the illegal immigration wreaking havoc in the state, Arizona lawmakers took matters into their own hands, enacting legislation that used state penalties and state police to try to give meaningful force to federal laws already on the books.

The federal-state power struggle ultimately landed before the Supreme Court, which, amid a swirl of politicized commentary on both sides of the matter, issued its ruling in June.The states would decide who could enter their ports, and their laws on that front dealt almost entirely with the exclusion of three types of individuals: criminals, paupers, and people suffering from contagious diseases.The resulting immigration system would strike us as exceptionally open and liberal.To allow each of the 50 states to enact its own immigration-control laws — even if those laws did not conflict with, but instead complemented, federal law — would, in the Court's view, violate the doctrine that "the States are precluded from regulating conduct in a field that Congress, acting within its proper authority, has determined must be regulated by its exclusive governance." In the eyes of the Court's majority, the regulation of immigration has been so thoroughly dominated by the federal government as to leave virtually no room for action by the states.Justice Antonin Scalia disagreed, writing in his dissent that such a ruling "deprives States of what most would consider the defining characteristic of sovereignty: the power to exclude from the sovereign's territory people who have no right to be there." The majority's opinion, he contended, is supported by "neither the Constitution itself nor even any law passed by Congress." Nor is it supported by the history of immigration in the United States.An exceptionally open immigration policy controlled by the states remained in place, while the federal government managed the naturalization process.This state of affairs began to change only in 1875, when the Supreme Court, in Henderson v."The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens....The federal power to determine immigration policy is well settled," opined Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court's majority in Arizona v. In a 5-3 decision (Justice Elena Kagan recused herself), the Court struck down most of the Arizona law and limited the permissible range of state activity in the realm of immigration enforcement.Designed almost five decades ago, that system has ceased to function effectively, to suit the needs and circumstances of today's society and economy, and to retain the support of the public.It is precisely the failure of that system that has driven Arizona and other states to try to fix the problem themselves, and that has prompted lawmakers at the national level to spend the better part of the past decade in pursuit of "comprehensive immigration reform." That effort has tortured the nation's politics and stoked controversy surrounding questions of race and national identity — and yet has achieved essentially nothing. Here, too, history points to the answer: Our immigration policies, and the role the federal government plays in them, tend to follow American political trends more broadly.


Comments U.S. Immigration Policy Essay

  • The Need for Immigration Reform Why Immigration Reform Does Not Only.

    Immigration reform is the best solution, millions of opponents make it almost impossible for anything to change. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the push pull factors that influence undocumented immigrants to migrate to the United Sates and to discuss what an immigration reform of the U. S immigration system must include.…

  • A brief history of US immigration policy and laws immigration.

    A brief history of U. S. immigration law. Prior to 1790, immigration policy was controlled by the individual states. In 1790 immigration policy was brought under U. S. Government control with a two-year residency requirement. In 1819, Congress enacted America's first significant immigration legislation, strengthening U. S. control over immigration.…

  • How U. S. Immigration Policy Has Changed Since 9/11 HuffPost

    U. S. immigration policy is inextricably linked with national security and border control policies. But that wasn’t always the case. The Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks prompted a major shift in the way the country handles immigration, creating new government bodies and tightening restrictions on who is and isn’t allowed in.…

  • Immigration Policy U. S. - Questia Online Library

    Discover librarian-selected research resources on Immigration Policy U. S. from the Questia online library, including full-text online books, academic journals, magazines, newspapers and more. Home Browse Politics and Government Public Policy Public Policy -- U. S. Immigration Policy U. S.…

  • The 9/11 e iTs L U.s. immigraTion Laws

    The executive branch also issued a number of regulatory and policy changes to immigration law and policy, many of which targeted arab, muslim and south asian communities. these policies which will be discussed in more de-tail by our speakers included a new mechanism for tracking students and visitors entering and leaving the U.s.;…

  • Historical Overview of Immigration Policy -

    The Center for Immigration Studies is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit research organization founded in 1985. It is the nation's only think tank devoted exclusively to research and policy analysis of the economic, social, demographic, fiscal, and other impacts of immigration on the United States.…

  • Short Essay on immigration -

    Essay on immigration. Immigration is what carves the picture of the modern world. Travelling from one country to other for trading had been popular since historic times. Immigration means the one way flow of the population to a specific place or country. People move out of the native country or state for various reasons.…

  • How Immigration Became So Controversial - The Atlantic

    Immigration seems to be the most prominent wedge issue in America. Senate Republicans and Democrats shut down the federal government over the treatment of immigrants brought to the U. S. illegally.…

  • History of U. S. Immigration Policy Japanese Migrants from 1868 to 1988.

    History of U. S. Immigration Policy Japanese Migrants from 1868 to 1988 - Essay Example. Comments 0 Add to wishlist Delete from wishlist. Cite this document Summary.…

The Latest from book-old2.ru ©