Tags: Classroom Management Observation EssayEssay About Myself EsteemEssay Of Euthanasia For And AgainstRole Of Energy In Development ThesisEssays Search EngineCause Of Divorce EssayGlobal Warming Is Not Man Made EssayOutsourcing Case Study Failure
This approach ignores the fact that most words are highly contextual, exhibiting multiple meanings or differing connotations depending upon the context.
While in an individual instance, word elimination may seem perfectly justified (especially in cases where the term has a long history of being used predominantly as a slur), the reality is that any and all words can be readily subjected to this sort of defamation - even our personal favorites!
Over the years, I have witnessed word elimination campaigns against virtually every trans-related word that I can think of (many specific examples are listed here).
But nowadays, I strive to avoid word-sabotage - when our belief that our favored word is inherently appropriate, righteous, liberating, and/or inclusive, leads us to automatically presume that people who use alternative language must be behaving in an offensive, incorrect, repressive, and/or exclusionary manner.
I have also become suspicious of word-elimination strategies - when we point to some aspect of a word’s origin, history, aesthetic quality (or lack thereof), literal meaning, alternate definitions, potential misinterpretations or connotations, or occasional exclusionary or defamatory usage, and use that as an excuse to claim that the term is oppressive and should be eliminated from the lexicon.
If a term does not appear here, it does not mean that it is illegitimate; it simply means that it is not one that I regularly use in my writings.
Keep in mind that other people may use certain terms differently than I do (and I often address such disparities in the entries).This is the online glossary for my third book: Outspoken: A Decade of Transgender Activism and Trans Feminism.It begins with a brief introductory essay, followed by the glossary itself (which you can skip ahead to by clicking that link).Glossaries can be quite useful, especially for books on specialized topics (e.g., transgender activism) that rely on subject-specific terminology.However, a drawback of glossaries is that they tend to give the impression that the words listed have cut-and-dried meanings that remain largely undisputed.: in my writings, this usually refers to the American Psychiatric Association, the organization that publishes the DSM (the so-called “psychiatric bible”).The same acronym may also refer to the American Psychological Association (who I sometimes refer to as the “good APA,” because they have historically been more progressive and less pathologizing than their psychiatric counterpart).Here is an analogy to help illustrate this dilemma: I have been a guitarist for about thirty years, and during that time, guitar-related language has barely changed at all.And the reason why it hasn’t changed is that guitarists are not marginalized in our culture - thus everything associated with guitar playing (including terminology) is generally free of negative connotations.While I will occasionally update some of these entries, most of this was written in 2015-16 (and thus likely reflects my thinking during that time period).: a phrase that I coined here (see Outspoken, pp.244-251) to describe how words that refer to marginalized identities/experiences/bodies become tainted by the stigma those groups face, thus leading activists to continually forward new replacement terms, which in turn eventually become tainted as well.