The combination of the two can be used when you are unsure of what side you are taking.
CHAPTER 5 Chapter five expresses the importance of how to use dialogue properly.
Implanting a naysayer in your work will help you think about what others will say against your claims.
You should implant a naysayer to show the readers that your view is not the only one that matters; however, if you don’t implant a naysayer then you may find that you have very little to say.
It is very important to ensure that the reader is able to easily to distinguish the “they say” from the “I say.” To avoid confusion the writer must use “voice markers” to make it easy for the reader to distinguish the different perspectives in the essay.
Without using these voice markers the information presented in the essay may be confusing to who is saying what.When you disagree you must say why you disagree with persuasive reasons of your particular view.There are different types of disagreeing; you can disagree by using the “duh” comment or even the “twist it” move, but you must give credible evidence to support why you disagree.Paraphrasing should be balanced throughout the writing with what someone else has said and your own interests as a writer.You must also talk about putting yourself in the other person’s shoes to believe the other person’s side to make your argument more appealing.If you use a naysayer’s reference it is important to use their specific ideology, but in some cases this is not always so.There are also templates that can be used to introduce the naysayer.You can also summarize satirically; which is when you put your own spin on someone else’s writing to place a balance on what they say, and what you say.When starting a summary, use verbs that have action; as a writer you should stay away from using phrases such as “she says.” Use phrases such as “she encourages,” to keep from putting the audience to sleep.The use of voice markers will keep the reader from having to stop and think.This also keeps them from becoming confused of the writer’s stance in the argument.