Empiricism is an approach to evidence that is aligned to the conventions associated with the natural sciences.
It is concerned with explaining external realities from an objective standpoint.
Your dissertation gives you an opportunity to write a substantial piece of academic work on a topic of interest to you.
It is an opportunity to produce a work of scholarship, using the academic skills you have developed.
This guidance is designed to help you write your MSc dissertation.
Please make sure that you also look at any instructions or guidance specific to your programme.Your literature review might draw on, among others: policy documents, legislation, statistics from surveys and government sources, research studies, relevant theory, etc.Having identified gaps in the literature and ways in which you can add value to the research, you need to present your research question and explain how the answer will add to current knowledge.Critical or criticalist: Any approach can result in criticism of health policy, but a critical(ist) approach is one that is grounded in the analysis of conflict or relationships of power.A critical(ist) approach may draw on elements of either or both of the other approaches but it is sceptical of empiricism and interpretivism because they do not necessarily question the underlying basis of the status quo.Having read the relevant literature, you need to focus more specifically on a research question.This will ensure that your dissertation has clear focus.Remember to ask for advice from your supervisor about which exact structure is right for your dissertation.If you are doing a piece of empirical research, a common structure is as follows: Abstract The abstract outlines what you did and what your key findings were.Your introduction should provide a brief overview of the structure of your dissertation (i.e. Literature review and policy context The literature review should include literature that is pertinent to your research topic and the policy context.It should critically evaluate earlier work in the field, paying due attention to contributions, and to any methodological problems and limitations involved.