Irony In Cask Of Amontillado Essay

This was in direct disregard for his instructions to them not to leave the house at all while he is away.Of course, there is the implication that he knew beforehand what they would do.

Tags: Education Dissertation TopicsEssay Paragraph LayoutAnorexia Nervosa Persuasive EssayWilliam And Mary DissertationBusiness Plan For An Internet CafeAnalytical Essay CathedralAntithesis In Julius Caesar

By the attendants behaving just as he had anticipated, Montresor gets his perfect alibi.

To protect themselves from the charge of absconding duty, they would swear that he had been on a journey and had not at all returned that whole day.

The third part of the tale on the other hand is reflected in the long journey that two take, only for Montresor to encourage Fortunato into reaching “the extremity of the niche” (Poe 7), where he found iron staples hindering his progress further into the crypt.

Here, Montresor chained Fortunato up, ready to avenge the perceived wrongs committed against him.

Unfortunately, Fortunato seems not to have suffered the pain of dying, as Montresor would have liked.

– Montresor triggers a paradox by juxtaposing in the same sentence the phrase “punish with impunity,” two words that are ordinarily antithetical.– There is a sense of this in Fortunato’s statement that he drinks to “the buried that repose around us” (Poe 5).Dead bodies may be immobile but as to whether they are at rest, is a matter of conjecture.It is as if Montresor, if he were understood for his true intentions, were saying, ‘It is your ill-luck that you have met me today’.It is often the cruelest hearts that fashion the most effective sarcasms: sarcasms so sharp-edged that they slice through their target audience’s ears without their ever getting to understand their full true meaning.In the first part, Monstresor is infuriated by what he perceives as an insult from Fortunato.As a result, he vows to inflict vengeance on Fortunato.As human nature would have it, people are often quicker to see weaknesses in other while ignoring their more apparent flaws.As such, Montresor finds his companion’s “transgression” worthy of the cruelest death, and believes that his cause is so right that he deserves to get away with it.As such, Montressor states that he would punish the person who inflicted him with injuries, because to him, the wrongs committed against him were worthy of punishment.Ironically, though, Montresor states that he would be avenging insults with death, since he perceived that as the ultimate revenge.