The purpose of the Foundation for Critical Thinking is to advance fairminded critical thinking in human societies across the world and in every part of human life.
The purpose of the Foundation for Critical Thinking is to advance fairminded critical thinking in human societies across the world and in every part of human life.We hope that our work is always used in keeping with this philosophy.Tags: Deepavali Essay In EnglishCourage Essay ConclusionProcess Essay How To Make ChocolateRice Application Essay PromptHow To Assign Static IpHow To Write Review Paper
JR: If I understand this concept of the “posthuman”, what you’re inviting me to assume here is something like this: that in the foreseeable future a range of technological developments – advances in neuro-chemistry and neuro-physiology, with accompanying psycho-pharmacology, genetic engineering, nano-technology, computer interfacing, and so on – will result in a “race” or “species” of humanoid creatures with capabilities in many areas (eg.
mental abilities) vastly superior to those we have ever known as human beings.
In your opinion how do you think the posthuman will utilize critical thinking: friendly or unfriendly?
JR: This strikes me as an essentially “fearful” question (even though you’ve resolved it for yourself by betting on “friendly” posthumans). and he is us.” So, coming back to this matter of how we choose to develop ourselves and our technologies, I’d prefer to bring this and other similar questions firmly into the present.
To return to your question, in such a scenario someone might wonder, Will posthumans need critical thinking skills? Or will humans evolve in such a way that critical thinking becomes superfluous, irrelevant, obsolete, or perceived as such?
I think the answer to the first of these questions is that humans will always need to work toward self-knowledge and responsible intellectual autonomy, and so what we now call “critical thinking” will always be essential to individual and collective (even post-) human well-being.
Still the question betrays a basic fear rooted in perennial doubt about good and evil in human nature. Rather than ask what the posthuman encounter will someday be like, we should be looking at what is driving development in the relevant technological areas today.
We’re afraid of ourselves or of what we’re turning ourselves into, perhaps with good reason. To what extent are these technological developments being aimed inward toward the deepening of human consciousness and the expansion of self-knowledge and driven wisely toward genuine understanding and improvement of the conditions of human and other forms of life?
In general we suggest that our theoretical work be used as is, rather than be reworded or reworked.
We of course invite high quality contextualizations of critical thinking in all domains.