In June, the Sixth International Conference on Climate Change took place in Washington D. It was organized by The Heartland Institute, headquartered in Chicago, and its primary objective is to "dispute the claim that global warming is a crisis." In 2008, the organization published a report titled "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate." Its president, Joseph Bast, talking to the journal Nature recently, discussed public opinion on climate change and the ongoing debate.
In June, the Sixth International Conference on Climate Change took place in Washington D. It was organized by The Heartland Institute, headquartered in Chicago, and its primary objective is to "dispute the claim that global warming is a crisis." In 2008, the organization published a report titled "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate." Its president, Joseph Bast, talking to the journal Nature recently, discussed public opinion on climate change and the ongoing debate.Tags: Research Essay On GenocideThe Birthmark Essay On SettingCollege Essay Questions BuzzfeedWhat Is A Dissertation TopicMaryknoll Essay ContestDescriptive Essay Of A JourneyMechanical Engineer EssayThe Homework Machine Dan Gutman
We are changing the Earth’s atmosphere by emitting huge amounts of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, most of which comes from the burning of fossil fuels.
Other human activities include agriculture and changes in land-use patterns.
The Brookings Institute released a report in April on the public opinion on climate change in the United States and Canada.
In a survey of 2,130 people, the report found that there is a progressive decrease in the number of people who think there is “solid evidence of global warming” and an increase in the number who think there is no solid evidence.
In the fall of 2008, 17 percent of people did not believe in global warming.
In the fall of 2010, that number had increased to 26 percent.[10 Surprising Results of Global Warming] The Sun's Energy Scientists and astronomers have studied the impact of the Sun on the Earth's climate as far back as the early 1800s.Historians have traced the earliest such studies to the research of Sir William Herschel, who tried to link the frequency of sunspots to the price of wheat.One side argues that the current global warming is caused by human factors while the other side insists it is occurring because of natural forces.In the latter argument, two natural causes that dominate the conversation are solar changes and changes to the Earth's orbit.The public discussion on climate change has become so polarized that some scientists don't even acknowledge there is a debate.Climate scientist at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Gavin Schmidt, is one of those people.“It may evoke some response so as to bring to the fore the substantial role of the natural forcing at work on the observed climate variability.” Mufti, however, did note that the evidence of the Sun and other natural forces being the primary cause for climate change is still inadequate.“We do not rule out the natural forcings at work,” he said, “but there isn't enough quantitative evidence to say that natural forcings are the dominant cause of current climate change.” Pointing out the geopolitical sensitivity of the topic itself, Mufti was careful not to rule out anthropogenic effects.“We have made it amply clear that the anthropogenic origins cannot also be ruled out,” Mufti said.Herschel’s study didn’t make a big impact at the time because he did not have access to historical temperature records to make any useful comparisons.However, there has been a significant amount of research conducted since then to show that variations in the Sun's energy output have an impact on changes in Earth’s climate.