As a reviewer, one of the first things you want to be sure to notice in the paper is if you can figure out who the paper is addressing.Tags: Kumon Business PlanWhat Is Literature EssayAccounting Path CanadaIsbm Operations Management Case Study AnswersEssay Lead In StatementsAwk Variable Assignment
They don't know for certain what direction your paper will go or what your arguments are.
This new, objective perspective brings great value in revision.
I like the way you presented your main points in each paragraph. Student 3: There are some really sound arguments you made as well. It sounds like you’re switching your point of view. The second half of the paragraph seems unnecessary. S Feedback Method until each student has been heard and reviewed. If you aren’t using this structure for your peer review in your class, you’ll likely be using something similar.
Student 4: I’m a little confused by your wording in the fourth paragraph. Student 1: I feel like you left us hanging in the second paragraph. Student 4: Paragraph five didn’t really add to your argument. Student 3: Yeah, it had a strong beginning and then sort-of meandered. After watching the video, click the image below to download a copy of the CARES feedback form.
A fresh set of eyes sees issues, gaps, mistakes and clouded arguments that you may have missed or had not thought of.
When your peer editor sits down and sifts through your paper, they provide both positive comments of what's going well in the paper, as well as opportunities for improvement in areas that may be unclear.But the peer edit can be so beneficial in enhancing your writing.We may often think of "peer review" in terms of journal articles that have been analyzed and approved for accuracy.Below are five questions that can help guide the process.Whether you're the author or the reviewer (or both), these five questions can help focus your attention on key components of the assignment and enhance your skills.This stage of the editing process is unique in that pulls in another perspective.Unlike you, your peer editor hasn't been immersed in reading and research on your paper's topic.A peer review of your research paper is different than the editing process that you go through.Rather than you going through each section, citation, argument in your paper, someone else does.A peer review involves handing it to someone you trust to allow them to read it and provide feedback to help make your paper the best it can be. It requires you to be vulnerable about what you've written.You need to be willing to accept mistakes you may make and be committed to accepting their suggestions as a way to grow in your writing and academic work.