States that did not ratify the Constitution would not be considered a part of the Union and would be separate countries.Passage of the Constitution by the states was by no means certain in 1787.
States that did not ratify the Constitution would not be considered a part of the Union and would be separate countries.Passage of the Constitution by the states was by no means certain in 1787.Tags: University Of Texas Transfer EssayOliver Twist English CourseworkBook Store Business PlanUf Admissions EssayPro Penalty EssayPsychological Report WritingFlorida Southern Admissions Essay
Instead, they believed that the Federalists had over-stated the current problems of the country.
They also maintained that the Framers of the Constitution had met as an elitist group under a veil of secrecy and had violated the provisions of the Articles of Confederation in the means selected for ratification of the Constitution.
As one member of their opposition, , said, these politicians "will not cherish the great oak which is to reduce them to paltry shrubs." The Federalists favored the creation of a strong federal government that would more closely unite the states as one large, continental nation.
They tended to come from the wealthier class of merchants and plantation owners.
Others were even ready to accept the Constitution if it were amended in such a way that the rights of citizens and states would be more fully protected.
The Federalists The Federalists focused their arguments on the inadequacies of national government under the Articles of Confederation and on the benefits of national government as formed by the Constitution.
Many of the questions raised remain with us today: What is the best form of government? Which government powers should be granted to the states, and which to the federal government?
The Anti-Federalists The Anti-Federalists found many problems in the Constitution.
That is, the Federalists did not see society as made up principally of farmers, as did the Anti-Federalists, but instead viewed it as comprising many different and competing interests and groups, none of which would be completely dominant in a federalist system of government.
For this reason, many later scholars have argued that the Federalists were more aware of the economic and social changes then transforming American society.