You are just seconds away from INSTANT ACCESS to tens of thousands of essays. If you can't find something, we will personally try our best to help you find whatever you are looking for.
O’Brien succinctly sums this up for Steve, “You’re young, you’re Black, and you’re on ... If he were involved in the crime, at least he may have learned his lesson through his time in prison and on trial. He is constantly reflecting upon this in his journal entries. By structuring the book as a movie script being written by the character as he spends his days in prison, faces his jury, prepares with his lawyer, confronts his mother and father, and, most importantly, examines his own life, Myers presents Steve as a talented young man who may have made a single poor choice. Printz Award, Winner, 2000 Kentucky Bluegrass Award, Grades 9-12, Winner, 2002 Mechele R. The word can also be found scribbled faintly and scratched out on pages of the novel itself. However, Myers retains conflict necessary for building a compelling storyline by having Steve refuse to acknowledge his part in Mr. The result is that the reader wants to sympathize with the teen, but cannot help but wonder, if Steve truly does not understand why what he did was wrong, what is going to keep him from going astray in the future? Therefore, think about what you are doing, consider the consequences of your actions, and choose wisely. Walter Dean Myers’ Monster - Guilty Until Proven Innocent Monster is an example of what Patty Campbell would call a “landmark book.” Texts such as these “encourage readers to interact with the text and with one another by employing a variety of devices, among them ambiguity” (Campbell 1) Because it is told through the eyes of Steve himself, the plot can be difficult to decipher.His lawyer, O’Brien, says in her closing statement, “What can we trace as to the guilt or innocence of my client, Steve Harmon? ” (245) This leaves the jury with an undoubtedly difficult decision, as well as the reader, because there are clues to both guilt and innocence in Steve’s case. The judicial system has many flaws, one of which being that they assume guilt before proof when it comes to people like Steve. He moved away, and the distance between us seemed to grow bigger and bigger” (280). The phrase “innocent until proven guilty” does not apply to cases like his. The reader is left pondering the good character of Steve, the bad friends he spent time with, the doctoring of his testimony, and the information that Steve provided us hinting both at his guilt and at his innocence. In a journal one of Steves entries he ponders, “What did I do? When commercial whaling started in 1910 the average numbers of whales killed per year were around 12,000. Steve’s innocence or guilt will be partly determined because of these things. When she was called to the stand, Petrocelli questioned Henry about what she had witnessed. Henry stated, “I saw two young men engaged in an argument.