We’ve talked about several useful writing tips that authors should consider while drafting or editing their research papers.In particular, we’ve focused on figures and legends, Methods, and Results.Unless you made so many errors that the results are completely unreliable, you will; certainly have learned something.
Do the results of the previous research help you to interpret your own findings? Either you have uncovered something new, or you may have made a major flaw with the design of the experiment.
Finally, after saying all of this, you can make a statement about whether the experiment has contributed to knowledge in the field, or not.
For example, one of your graphs may show a distinct trend, but not enough to reach an acceptable significance level.
Remember that no significance is not the same as no difference, and you can begin to explain this in your discussion section.
This means you're free to copy, share and adapt any parts (or all) of the text in the article, as long as you give appropriate credit and provide a link/reference to this page. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page.
You can use it freely (with some kind of link), and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations (with clear attribution).You must also recommend how we might get to point C (i.e., identify what you think is the next direction for research in this field). For additional information about how to write a strong research paper, make sure to check out our full research writing series!If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post in the comment box below, email us at [email protected] reach out to us through our Contact Us page.In a nutshell, your Discussion fulfills the promise you made to readers in your Introduction.At the beginning of your paper, you tell us why we should care about your research.You then guide us through a series of intricate images and graphs that capture all the relevant data you collected during your research. To be honest, you will edit the Discussion part of your manuscript numerous times. As we stated above, the goal of your Discussion section is to answer the questions you raise in your Introduction by using the results you collected during your research.We may be dazzled and impressed at first, but none of that matters if you deliver an anti-climactic conclusion in the Discussion section! After all, in as little as one to two paragraphs (‘s suggestion based on their 3,000-word main body text limit), you have to explain how your research moves us from point A (issues you raise in the Introduction) to point B (our new understanding of these matters). The content you include in the Discussions segment should reflect the following information: As you edit or draft your research manuscript, we hope that you implement these guidelines to produce a more effective Discussion section.You should always put your findings into the context of the previous research that you found during your literature review.Do your results agree or disagree with previous research?Once writing the discussion section is complete, you can move onto the next stage, wrapping up the paper with a focused conclusion.The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).