The FDA, meanwhile, only regulates the potential safety and efficacy of these techniques, not their ethical implications.
But when bringing a new child into the world, society has an obligation to determine whether the technologies used to do so actually benefit or harm the infant.
” Reading the article, you might be left with the impression that even thinking about designer babies would be alarmist, unscientific, or just silly.
As public interest advocates who are focused on the social implications of human biotechnologies, my colleagues and I see how often the term “designer babies” serves as a distraction in these discussions—and we usually avoid using it ourselves.
Parents have the choice of what color eye they want their child to have, what shape face or nose they want them to receive and what color and type of hair they want their child to have.
The process of genetic screening also provides them the choices of what physical traits and personality traits out of one particular parent they want the child to receive.
Designing a baby may seem easy, A great number of people believe that when they hear the term designer baby, they imagine the image of two parents choosing and fixing their unborn child.
“According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a designer baby is 'A baby whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected by genetic engineering combined with IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) to ensure the presence or absence of particular genes or characteristics” (Buzzle.com, 2011, Designer para. Designer babies basically allow doctors to fix, alter, and adjust any trait or other gene that belongs to the baby exactly how the parents want (Buzzle.com, 2011, Designer para. Creating a designer baby is an intense and difficult process, and the assurance of positive outcomes is not a guarantee.
"If we did think that was wrong, we should give up parenting, and put them out on the street."And even if there were some potential harms of "designer babies," those drawbacks may not be worth regulating, said John Robertson, a law and bioethics professor at the University of Texas at Austin, who was not involved in the work.
If there were a family that really valued musicality, for instance, and "if they have four embryos and one has the perfect pitch trait, then why should they not be able to choose that embryo? The potential harms, such as parents forcing a child to study trombone when the kid would rather play soccer, don't seem big enough to interfere with parental choice, he added.