Tags: English Term Paper IdeasDissertation On Customer Satisfaction In BanksMask Of The Red Essay QuestionsFree Paper WriterUsc Dissertation Support CenterCovering Letter For Cv Via EmailInvestment Dissertation TopicsEssay On Why A College Is Right For You
Caesar is the author of this account and as such is unlikely to speak negatively about himself.
The oligarchy had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo in order to protect wealth and land, and stop political revolutionary activity.
The evidence supports the viewpoint of Wiseman (1971:8) who, in considering the opinion of Syme, states that ‘Caesar was accused of opening the Senate to riff raff of all sorts.’ The evidence demonstrates that Caesar’s actions would have been particularly unpopular likely resulting in sections of the senate turning against him, particularly those who risked losing positions of authority.
The dilution of the aristocratic element of the Senate and appointment through use of dictatorial power would all have been unpopular with the oligarchy.
This evidence will demonstrate that there are a number of key factors, particularly from 45 and 44 BC, that resulted in a conspiratorial group forming and assassinating Caesar.
Members of the Senate of the Roman Republic, in most circumstances, were from the Roman oligarchy and some Italian provinces.