Policy and social changes that protect lesbian and gay families are a much more pressing need. Throughout history, parents who have lost children have grieved and sought consolation from family and community.
"Replacing" the deceased child by cloning degrades and dehumanizes the child, its replacement, and all of us. Rights are socially negotiated, and no "right" to clone oneself has ever been established.
If cloning could be perfected and used for this limited group, it would be all but impossible to prevent its use from spreading.
Further, this argument appropriates the phrase "genetically related" to embrace a condition that has never before occurred in human history, one which abolishes the genetic variations that have always existed between parent and child. Even if cloning were safe, it would be impossible to allow reproductive cloning for lesbians or gay men without making it generally available to all.
It creates a question whether or not cloning would be an option to all levels of society, or would the prices be so high that only a few will be able to afford it?
Cloning Essay Pros And Cons
As of today, natural way of reproductions is definitely the cheapest one.
But at the same time it creates a situation in which efforts to fully clone both, will eventually result in lack of DNA distinction.
Even with all modern technologies and knowledge that scientists have access to, they are not able to predict behavior of viruses and other unexpected things that cloned species will have to face in the future.
But it will probably leave humanity with a far more important question, as to how to put it to the right use.
A child produced by cloning would be the genetic duplicate of an existing person.