Tags: What Is A True Friend EssayResearch Paper Topics For Computer ScienceCognitive Processes Critical ThinkingAbout.Com College Admission EssayWhat Are The Main Elements Of An Expository EssayEssay On Sophists
For this explanation, we will use the example of Globalization.We need to identify which perspective is positive (or in favor) negative (not in favor), and the awkward one which lay somewhere in-between.
This is ultimately the thoughtful formula that the ACT readers are looking for.
What better to critically engage to the point of total rejection?
As all expository essays follow, your intro should contain an attention-grabbing statement a lead-in to the thesis (bridge), and a thesis.
The body paragraphs, per normal, should have a topic sentence, explanation of that topic sentence, claim, evidence, and warrant.
Perspective Three says Globalization increases xenophobic attitudes and promotes ethnic conflict.
Now, we see how each one approaches globalization to say that Perspective One is definitely pro, Perspective Three is definitely con, and Perspective Two is weird and approaches the topic in a totally distinct way, so its our outlier.This should always, ALWAYS, be an expository essay.I recommend intro, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion.For example, again,"Perspective Two makes the closet relationship to alternative methods to which globalization aspires, but still does not actually suggest what Globalization might actually be.Analyzing globalization as a unique evolution of language especially through social media and the development of the English lingua franca, is the absolute best method to view a world of convergence and homogeneity."I should also mention that these are outlines. You should begin by saying something mildly philosophical in nature of the prompt and the perspective you developed, such as "Although the Perspectives argue over the good and bad aspects of globalization, it must be understood that they misunderstand the very nature of globalization for what it actually is." From here, you should just tie a nice bow on the essay by restating your thesis and reiterating your attention-grabbing statement.The conclusion should make a general claim about your perspective, have a reiteration of the thesis, and close with a reiteration of the idea presented in the attention-grabbing statement.The introduction and conclusion really are normal, and typically don't require much outside training based on what most of you should already be aware of in essay writing.There, of course, are plenty of online resources that attempt to explain the format and approach and several practice tests that host a myriad of distinct prompts, but never seem to address the fundamental issues that surround this essay and its nauseating strategies. It is a silly little game that does not assess your writing skills even in the slightest, but demonstrates how well you CAN PLAY YOUR READERS.I would like to be of aid in this manner and address how I approached the essay and how I believe it is much easier to score in the 10 range than it is made out to be. As I have previously explained, I am a junior and have only tested once (December). I had prepared for about a week before the exam, took one practice test two days before the exam date, and wrote one essay the day before the exam just to get a grip of what it was all about. I fact, when you begin to view it under the lens I ascribe, I am sure you will begin to see the pieces fall in place. For those of you unaware, the ACT Writing section gives you a general prompt, followed by three "Perspectives." This prompt always revolves around the status quo and social issues within it, say Robots, Global Warming, Bullying, etc.The three perspectives are simple boxes that all take a different opinion towards the prompt presented most always one being for, one against, and one neutral/centrist.This is the struggle I think people find with the essay.