It provided money and credit to many of the lower classes that Jackson defended, and also was the source of much economic growth.
It provided money and credit to many of the lower classes that Jackson defended, and also was the source of much economic growth.As a result of this veto Jackson established pet banks in many Western areas to try to appease his main group of supporters and build up the rivalry between the agrarian South and West and the industrial North (C).That, he said was the reason he vetoed the re-charter.Tags: How Do I Write A Conclusion Paragraph For An EssayRise Of Hitler Essay Questions1500 Word Essay PagesResearch Paper Transportation EngineeringEssay On Importance Of Education5 Critical Thinking Skills
A period of nearly 30 years are associated with the Presidency of Jefferson, his successors and his ‘democracy’ from 1801 until Andrew Jackson’s election in 1828.
A vision of a united, equal America, limited government and natural aristocracy ruled the Jeffersonian style of democracy.
However, with the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828, a new form of democracy, differentiating in multiply ways to the Jeffersonian America, engulfed the American political and social scene....
[tags: Government, America] - When John Quincy Adams was elected to the office of president of the United States in 1824, “hot headed” Jackson was infuriated.
They also thought of themselves as guardians of political democracy, while at the same time using class differences to their advantage and emotionalized speeches, lacking real intellectual merit, to stir support.
Jacksonian Democrats felt that they were the protectors of the Constitution and of individual liberties but many times they put their rivalry with the Northeastern industry and Whig politics before these things.
He was very against the Bank of America because he believed it to have a monopoly on banking and felt that it was owned and run unjustly by wealthy aristocrats who were not always Americans (B).
It must also be noted however, that while the Bank of America was undoubtedly corrupt (Nicholas Biddle is known to have given sums of money to close friends, and was also known to regularly bribe newspapers and similar media.) it also did what it was supposed to do very well.
Meaning that they felt that they were true followers of the ideals of the Constitution, including political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. Since people other than the common controlled the bank, the Democratic Jacksonians disapproved of this. Jackson and the Jacksonian democrats were campaigners of individual rights but ignored the rights of Native Americans. Although the Jacksonians declared that they stood for equali... But in the world of democracy, everyone has a different view. The Jacksonian Democrats and their president did, however strive to expand political democracy. In the aspect of individual liberty, it seems that this was one subject that did not fall under the Jacksonian's guardianship. President Jackson and the Jacksonians did show virtue when it came to an equality in economic opportunity. They did, however provide political democracy and economic opportunity....
Then came Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the United States of America, and the Jacksonian Democrats who held ideals so steadfastly that they caused a schism in the previous Democratic "Republican Party. In holding to these beliefs, Jackson and his party were valid in viewing themselves as guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy and individual liberties. The bank was viewed by many northerners as the only favorable aspect of the Jacksonian presidency geared to helping the north.